Re: [Harp-L] advanced?

[icemanle@xxxxxxx]

 I believe Jim R. defined the intermediate in his email....

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bradford Trainham <bradford.trainham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: icemanle@xxxxxxx; harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, Jan 17, 2010 8:13 pm
Subject: RE: [Harp-L] advanced?


But shouldn't intermediate be defined also?
(Clean single notes, competence on holes 7-10, credible vibrato, good use of
hands to color tone, reliable bends, new-pants/nice-haircut????)
Brad (in advanced regression) Trainham

 

-----Original Message-----
From: harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:harp-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of icemanle@xxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, January 17, 2010 5:40 PM
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] advanced?


 Perhaps another way to put it would be - advanced class wouldn't deal with
TB per se, but would assume that everyone attending can...

What slows down the class is the one or two students, over their heads,
needing assistance where the rest of the class twiddles thumbs while waiting
to get on with it..

 


 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Ross <jross38@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, Jan 17, 2010 6:08 pm
Subject: [Harp-L] advanced?


Jim Rossen writes: 
 
"To me, the distinction between intermediate and advanced blues 
diatonic player is <snip>   My apologies if I offend anyone..... 
 
Advanced-
tongue block" 
 
I'm not offended, just can't understand why tongue blocking would be
considered advanced.  It was (is?) the standard technique of most blues
harmonica players, perhaps most harmonica players in general.  It's
certainly not a hard technique, no moreso than puckering for single notes. 
 
Just struck me as odd. 
 
 
JR Ross 
 
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l 

 
_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l